- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:15:31 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Tommy Widenflycht <tommyw@google.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-08-21 18:15, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 21 August 2013 06:21, Tommy Widenflycht <tommyw@google.com> wrote: >> So a user wants to send the audio MST through PC1 (with relay) and the video >> MST through PC2. How does this require a MST to belong to more that one MS? > > In order to send A on PC1 and V on PC2, you need to have separate > MediaStream instances, one for each PC. Maybe you could use the same > MediaStream and synthetically reject certain m-lines from each PC, but > that doesn't help the receiving end. > >> And how can there be any expectation that the audio and video are >> synchronized on the receiving side? > > This has to be possible. The two tracks have the same source, with > the same clock, and they should have the same (RTCP) CNAME. > Assembling the two tracks into a single MS at the receiver should > result in the playback being synchronized. I agree fully to this (and this is what I tried to express at the Boston interim). > >
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 08:16:01 UTC