On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org> wrote: > I'd prefer a split() call that would make sure the current encoded > sequence is properly terminated and a new one is started, but it would be > hard to tell which blob is what in the ondataavailable event. (I _suppose_ > we could abuse the blob type to encode that, but that'd be quite a hack) > split() could trigger the firing of a "done" event after the dataavailable of the last Blob for the current sequence. Calling the method stopAndRestart() might make that clearer. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 22:00:52 UTC