W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Playability of individual Blobs produced by a MediaRecorder

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:00:25 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLY1X45a2Z8H=PBytuUi74ASghHm-M=JMOVkojrW958fVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org>
Cc: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org> wrote:

> I'd prefer a split() call that would make sure the current encoded
> sequence is properly terminated and a new one is started, but it would be
> hard to tell which blob is what in the ondataavailable event. (I _suppose_
> we could abuse the blob type to encode that, but that'd be quite a hack)
>

split() could trigger the firing of a "done" event after the dataavailable
of the last Blob for the current sequence. Calling  the method
stopAndRestart() might make that clearer.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 22:00:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC