W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Playability of individual Blobs produced by a MediaRecorder

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:00:25 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLY1X45a2Z8H=PBytuUi74ASghHm-M=JMOVkojrW958fVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org>
Cc: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Rachel Blum <groby@chromium.org> wrote:

> I'd prefer a split() call that would make sure the current encoded
> sequence is properly terminated and a new one is started, but it would be
> hard to tell which blob is what in the ondataavailable event. (I _suppose_
> we could abuse the blob type to encode that, but that'd be quite a hack)

split() could trigger the firing of a "done" event after the dataavailable
of the last Blob for the current sequence. Calling  the method
stopAndRestart() might make that clearer.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 22:00:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC