On 10/9/2012 8:51 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Harald Alvestrand > <harald@alvestrand.no <mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>> wrote: > > On 10/09/2012 09:49 AM, Cyril Concolato wrote: > > Le 10/9/2012 7:26 AM, Robert O'Callahan a écrit : > > http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html#methods-1 > The current draft says that createObjectURL mints a Blob > URL for a MediaStream. I don't think that is a good idea, > since Blobs are static objects (an immutable array of > bytes), and MediaStreams are a constantly-changing stream > of media data. So a URL constructed for a MediaStream > cannot be used everywhere a Blob could be used, for > example it can't be loaded via XmlHttpRequest. > > I agree - the Blob URL here is very much used as "opaque token > passed from one API to another", not as "first-class object you > can actually do things with". > Mozilla's argued before that the use of "getURL(stream)" is not > appropriate, and we should instead define a "srcObject" attribute > on the HTML media elements - but this spec hasn't landed yet. > > > I still argue that, but as long as createObjectURL is around we should > make it work as well as possible :-). I'll note since Rob didn't mention it that Mozilla's current nightlies and (in a day or so) Aurora (FF18) have video.mozSrcObject = stream support, and we've dropped support for video.src = stream. -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.orgReceived on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 21:21:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:12 UTC