W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > November 2012

Re: revised recording proposal

From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:53:06 +0100
Message-ID: <50B71462.3040605@ericsson.com>
To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 11/28/2012 08:28 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:
> There is a difference between returning a blob at timeSlice intervals
> until stopRecording is called, versus returning a File object only
> once.  I don't want to get into a discussion on how different GC's
> are treating blobs today, but to say that there is no performance
> difference between the two is premature.

That is an aspect I did not consider! I - na´vely - was only thinking 
about the API layer.

If I understand you correctly, the issue is more related to returning 
several instances of (time-sliced) recorded data during an ongoing 
recording vs. only one set of data after the recording has ended than to 
the actual handling of Blob's vs. File's.

Stefan
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 07:53:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:12 UTC