- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:15:09 +0100
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 2012-11-13 12:18, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 11/12/2012 08:42 PM, Jim Barnett wrote: >> >> Here’s a summary of what I think we agreed to in Lyon. If we still >> agree to it, I will start writing it up. (Please send comments on any >> or all of the points below.) >> > I think I like this. I'd like to see this as a proposal. >> >> Recording should be implemented by a separate class. Its constructor >> will take a MediaStream as an argument (we can define it to take >> other types as well, if we choose, but no one is suggesting any at the >> moment.) >> >> There are two kinds of recording: >> >> 1)incremental, in which (smaller) Blobs of data are returned to the >> application as they are available. >> >> 2)All-at-once, in which one big Blob of data is made available when >> recording is finished. >> > So are these 2 classes that both take a MediaStream as a constructor > argument? > This might be simpler than having one merged class that does both. I read the proposal as one class with two different record methods. /Adam
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 12:15:33 UTC