- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:10:28 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 03/08/2012 12:21 PM, Rich Tibbett wrote: > Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> Are you planning to use a vendor prefix for PeerConnection and friends? > > No. Prefixing APIs in final browser builds is damaging to the concept > of an open, ubiquitous web and leads to developers creating web > experiences that target individual UAs. This practice affect vendors, > developers and users and increasingly locks the web in silos. > > Either an API is mature enough for release or it's not. CSS vendor > prefixes is a lesson learned. We don't want to see a repeat of this > practice. I haven't been able to detect consensus on this topic yet. We (Google) have to live within the webkit set of rules, and those rules seem to still insist on prefixes. > > http://paulirish.com/2012/vendor-prefixes-are-not-developer-friendly/ > http://robertnyman.com/2012/02/16/thoughts-on-the-css-prefix-situation/ > > - Rich > >
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2012 17:11:02 UTC