- From: ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ <tommyw@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 14:35:57 +0200
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
- Cc: Per Kjellander <perkj@google.com>
- Message-ID: <CALLKCfN=26mrVRV8Z1yQne9uzbKQ5=HQKeQmyB7=ocCBYb1nEA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I am a bit confused regarding the latest draft regarding how MediaStreamTracks should behave when they are part of more than one MediaStream. It used to be that when a MediaStream was created with a list of Tracks one created new tracks that had the same underlying data source as the input tracks. Basically one cloned the tracks. Now the draft says that the new MediaStream should add the same Tracks to its lists. That means that the same Track can now belong to more than one MediaStream. This has an unfortunate effect that if one disables a Track, the Track gets disabled in all MediaStreams. It is no longer possible to have independent enabled stated, and for example this basic use case is impossible: A LocalMediaStream is created by getUserMedia. The user creates a new MediaStream with the video track from the LMS. The LMS is attached to a video tag for self view, and the MS is added to a PeerConnection. The user wants to implement a video mute function for outgoing video and therefore disables the video track in the MS. This now disables the video track in the LMS as well whereas before this was doing the right thing. What is the reasoning behind this change? /Tommy -- Tommy Widenflycht, Senior Software Engineer Google Sweden AB, Kungsbron 2, SE-11122 Stockholm, Sweden Org. nr. 556656-6880 And yes, I have to include the above in every outgoing email according to EU law.
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 12:36:24 UTC