- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:41:05 -0800
- To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 10 December 2012 10:53, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterriberry@mozilla.com> wrote: >> One advantage of an API like this is that it can >> perform the necessary sanity checks and reject as necessary. >> Switching at the source would reject a larger number of substitutions >> due to being unaware of the full range of options available. Sure, >> one source might not have the same set of codecs, but if those codecs >> were negotiated, the switch could still proceed. > > > I'm not following your argument here (it wasn't even clear to which API > "this" refers to in the first sentence). Apologies. "One advantage of an API that operates at the sink attachment point (i.e. RTCPeerConnection) is that it can..."
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 19:41:30 UTC