- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:53:50 +0000
- To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
> From: Randell Jesup [mailto:randell-ietf@jesup.org] > > On 8/23/2012 10:03 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > > (Note - I think we need to separate cleanly the constraints, which > > apply to capabilities of the device, from *commands* to the device, > > like "turn the flash on" or "pan to the left" - the latter needs to be > > an interface like what Rich is suggesting. It can't be expressed > > sensibly using constraints.) > > Agreed; see my last message. I'd be interested in how well Rich's proposal > handles the usecases I mention there. (I'm behind in my reading here). Yeah, some settings work better as properties, e.g., Booleans. (use flash, use backlight, etc., all the toggles) The settings that I map to constraints (in my head) are the ones that take ranges (mostly stuff like resolution and framerate) Having a list of these to talk in specifics will be very helpful.
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2012 18:54:24 UTC