Re: New version of Editor's Draft

look forward to this recorder proposal.
one question,  will recorder be a html5 tag similar to <video>,<audio> and
can be used independent of  Media Caputure or just part of Media Capature
to work for record MediaStream? thanks

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On 4/27/12 7:09 PM, William Lin wrote:
>
>> Seems MediaStreamRecorder is removed. And all the function record()
>> related is removed too.
>> No clear the story of how was this decision made.
>> Or in next step, recorder will be added?
>>
>
> I apologize, I didn't mention in my earlier email that the other change
> was the removal of MediaStreamRecorder. We've been talking on the list
> about removing it for a while now - once we have a new proposal we'll be
> adding something similar to the spec.
>
> The main problem with the old MediaStreamRecorder was that it was defined
> in terms of a MediaStream, but it seems more desirable to have such a
> recorder work directly with the outputs of a MediaStream, such as <video>,
> <audio>, or even <canvas>. One of my TODO items is to come up with such a
> proposal, which I will do as soon as possible!
>
> Thanks,
> -Anant
>
>  On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com
>> <mailto:anant@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    Hi all,
>>
>>    I just committed a new version of the editor's draft for the
>>    getUserMedia specification, you can find it at the usual place:
>>    http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/**__editor/getusermedia.html<http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/__editor/getusermedia.html>
>>
>>    <http://dev.w3.org/2011/**webrtc/editor/getusermedia.**html<http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html>
>> >
>>
>>    The big change for this version was moving the MediaStream
>>    definition from the PeerConnection document.
>>
>>    Please send your feedback and comments to the list.
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>    -Anant
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>