W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture-logs@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [mediacapture-record] Add MediaRecorderOptions.forceVideoFrameRate (#113)

From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:30:37 +0000
To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-275453348-1485451835-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@miguelao

I agree with @foolip that slo-mo and timelapse (a and b) are better 
served by a scale feature.

I agree with @Pehrsons that for "smoothing bursty input" (c) the 
result seems undesirable, because it would effectively slow down and 
speed up in places of burts. Imagine music being attached to this, it 
would probably sound pretty awful, like off an old VHS tape.

As @Pehrsons illustrated for me, if the camera was filming an actual 
wall clock we'd at least expect it to move at a consistent speed in 
the output, whatever frame rate it's showing.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/pull/114#issuecomment-275453348
 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2017 17:30:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:31 UTC