- From: Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:27:15 +0000
- To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
@jan-ivar I'd like to see the concrete proposal of @alvestrand about how this all should look like if we were to a) move the "live" settings to the track constraints (that track could only be of video type) and b) pass all other constraints to `takePhoto()` (so grabFrame() would only reflect the "live" settings, which is the current behaviour of spec and implementations). In particular, would a) look like an extension to [`MediaTrackSupportedConstraints`](https://www.w3.org/TR/mediacapture-streams/#media-track-supported-constraints)? Would it be added to the `Media Capture and Streams` Spec (which is now CR)? >From the implementation POV, I'd love for this debate to be closed ASAP so I can adapt Chromium either way. @jan-ivar , what are the plans to implement takePhoto() and the settings in FF? -- GitHub Notification of comment by miguelao Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/issues/124#issuecomment-268377511 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2016 22:27:21 UTC