W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture-logs@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [mediacapture-image] Use the constrainable pattern instead of creating a subtly different function set

From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 21:36:14 +0000
To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-268366166-1482269772-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@miguelao s/zoom/all live settings/ in what I [already 
said](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/issues/124#issuecomment-268087463).
 That would be one way.
"Two ways of configuring" is unavoidable, unless you plan on re-adding
 `width` and `height` options.

I don't think we need to extend `MediaStreamTrack` to add constraints 
FWIW.

As to using constraints for delayed settings, what would you expect 
e.g. `track.getSettings().exposureMode` to return?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/issues/124#issuecomment-268366166
 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2016 21:36:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:31 UTC