W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > March 2014

Re: Transition to REC for "API for Media Resources 1.0".

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 14:29:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+OuRR93z=03nQK7eYTtHqHXh0ZPw2jnpwQi-1HUbgaVhGwwMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Cc: Florian Stegmaier <florian.stegmaier@uni-passau.de>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, Joakim Soderberg <j.soderberg@samsung.com>
Adding "Metadata" makes perfect sense for me.


On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This is to let you know that the W3C Director has approuved to move "API
> for Media Resources 1.0" to REC  [1]
>
> yes finally ;-)))
>
> Remains a small issue, before publishing the REC.
>
> The Director is sympathetic  with the suggestion from a W3C member
> during the PR review, to add the word  "Metadata" to the beginning of
> the title, as he says that indeed it makes it clearer.
> " Without qualifying "API", it will be confused with other media related
> API functionality."
>
> So the question is:
>
> Who from the MAWG would disapprove the change of Title ?
> from
> "API for Media Resources 1.0"
> to
> "Metadata API for Media Resources 1.0"
>
> If there are no objection by next friday, I will request publication of
> this spec as REC.
>
> Thierry
>
>
>   [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/REC/
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 13:29:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:54 UTC