Re: MAWG - update RDF

And one more thing,

The already existing errata at
http://www.w3.org/2012/01/mediaont-10-errata.html

are also in the new files ?
(I havn't check).

Thierry

On 22/03/2013 07:30, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> Dear Michel,
>
> thanks for the instructions. We'll follow your recommendations.
>
> I hope the group will agree as the file is otherwsie not validating in particular because of a non persistent refernece from Dublin Core. But I would of course provide you with the detailed information needed for the errata.
>
> I guess we'll need to organise a MAWG call soon.
>
> Best regards,
>
> jean-Pierre
> ________________________________________
> From: Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: 21 March 2013 20:44
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: 'Joakim Soderberg'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF
>
> Jean Pierre,
>
>
> We have those two files included (nested)  in the Ontology for Media
> Resources 1.0 Recommendation
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#ont-owl
> http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#ont-ttl
>
> and also published at
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>
>
> If I update these two files there, then there will be a deferent version
> in the Recommendation.
>
> The only way to solve this is to update these two files at
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>
> and publish an errata with these changes at
> http://www.w3.org/2012/01/mediaont-10-errata.html
>
>
> Therefore I need
> 1- to have the Group to approve these changes.
> 2- Know the exact changes to update the errata page.
>
> Is this OK ?
>
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 21/03/2013 17:13, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
>> Me too and I insist that these are corrections and not changes.
>>
>> Best, JP
>>
>> From: Joakim Soderberg [mailto:soderberg.pj@gmail.com]
>> Sent: jeudi, 21. mars 2013 16:40
>> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF
>>
>> I hope it gets accepted. Thierry, will this have to be published as a separate version?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch<mailto:evain@ebu.ch>> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> A group of MAWG members are making a submission to an RFT from ISO/JPEG proposing to adopt our ma-ont ontology.
>>
>> This submission contains links to the rdf and ttl files accessible from:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>>
>> A couple of corrections have proved to be required with no impact on the ontology structure:
>>
>> 1/ surprisingly the reference to DublinCore in RDF (e.g. used for comments) was broken and had to be replaced
>> 2/ the collectionName property used to be declared as a subclass of rdfs:label but this generates problems. Therefore collectionName is now just a dataProperty like for title, description, etc.
>> 3/ we have added a comment saying that the rdf an ttl files take precedence over the specification, which contains a copy of the rdf file (and we think that the corrections made do not justify going through a revision of the specification itself).
>>
>> This work has been carried out in collaboration with Pierre-Antoine Champin (who also generated the ttl file) and Tobias Buerger.
>>
>> The corrected files are attached and we have asked Thierry Michel to upload these new versions in place of the existing ones.
>>
>> We hope that this is agreeable to all members of the MAWG.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jean-Pierre
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>

Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 07:30:25 UTC