Re: MAWG - update RDF

Jean Pierre,


We have those two files included (nested)  in the Ontology for Media 
Resources 1.0 Recommendation

http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#ont-owl
http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#ont-ttl

and also published at
http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl


If I update these two files there, then there will be a deferent version 
in the Recommendation.

The only way to solve this is to update these two files at
http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl

and publish an errata with these changes at
http://www.w3.org/2012/01/mediaont-10-errata.html


Therefore I need
1- to have the Group to approve these changes.
2- Know the exact changes to update the errata page.

Is this OK ?


Thierry






On 21/03/2013 17:13, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> Me too and I insist that these are corrections and not changes.
>
> Best, JP
>
> From: Joakim Soderberg [mailto:soderberg.pj@gmail.com]
> Sent: jeudi, 21. mars 2013 16:40
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF
>
> I hope it gets accepted. Thierry, will this have to be published as a separate version?
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch<mailto:evain@ebu.ch>> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> A group of MAWG members are making a submission to an RFT from ISO/JPEG proposing to adopt our ma-ont ontology.
>
> This submission contains links to the rdf and ttl files accessible from:
>
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>
> A couple of corrections have proved to be required with no impact on the ontology structure:
>
> 1/ surprisingly the reference to DublinCore in RDF (e.g. used for comments) was broken and had to be replaced
> 2/ the collectionName property used to be declared as a subclass of rdfs:label but this generates problems. Therefore collectionName is now just a dataProperty like for title, description, etc.
> 3/ we have added a comment saying that the rdf an ttl files take precedence over the specification, which contains a copy of the rdf file (and we think that the corrections made do not justify going through a revision of the specification itself).
>
> This work has been carried out in collaboration with Pierre-Antoine Champin (who also generated the ttl file) and Tobias Buerger.
>
> The corrected files are attached and we have asked Thierry Michel to upload these new versions in place of the existing ones.
>
> We hope that this is agreeable to all members of the MAWG.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 19:50:28 UTC