- From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:38:50 +0200
- To: Joakim Soderberg <soderberg.pj@gmail.com>, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi Joakim, > Perhaps "on the fly" is somewhat casual for > a specification. Consider saying online instead. Personally I'm ok with on the fly, but we can change it with an alternative. However, I find "online" is ambiguous in a Web context. Best regards, Werner > -----Original Message----- > From: Joakim Soderberg [mailto:soderberg.pj@gmail.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 02. Juli 2013 06:04 > To: Thierry MICHEL > Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org > Subject: Re: review Proposed Recommendation version of the API for Media > Resources 1.0 > > I can't find any major issues after a first review. > I like the updated Figure 1, and I had no problem following the accompanying > text describing the two scenarios. Perhaps "on the fly" is somewhat casual for > a specification. Consider saying online instead. > > -JS > > On 26 Jun 2013, at 01:26, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > > > All, > > > > Here is the Proposed Recommendation version of the API for Media > > Resources 1.0 > > > > https://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/PR2/ > > > > Please review carefully this document. > > > > This will be the last review before going to final Recommendation. > > > > Thanks for you help. > > > > Best, > > > > Thierry > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 11:39:15 UTC