Re: MAWG - update RDF - PROPOSED TEXT FOR ERRATA

When we have the corrections in place, we want to publish a new ontology
file on our TR space.


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached the new errata items addressing the changes made to
> the rdf/owl and derived ttl files
>
> Please let me know if I missed something.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@
>
> NEW ERRATA ITEMS
>
> 1/ E0XXX: Correction in the RDF/OWL representation of the Media Ontology
> in section 7.3
>
> Description:
>
> In the RDF/OWL representation of the Media Ontology, the property
> ma:collectionName is declared to be a subproperty
> of rdfs:label. This declaration is being removed to avoid problems of
> incompatibilities.
>
> Resolution:
>
> <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:ID="collectionName">
> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Collection"/>
> <rdfs:comment>The name by which a collection (e.g. series) is
> known.</rdfs:comment>
> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="
> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label"/>
> </owl:DatatypeProperty>
>
> Changed to :
>
> <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:ID="collectionName">
> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Collection"/>
> <rdfs:comment>The name by which a collection (e.g. series) is
> known.</rdfs:comment>
> </owl:DatatypeProperty>
>
> The updated RDF/OWL representation is available at
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
>
> 2/ E0XXX: Correction in the TTL representation of the Media Ontology in
> section 8
>
> Description:
>
> In the RDF/OWL representation of the Media Ontology, the property
> ma:collectionName is declared to be a subproperty
> of rdfs:label. This declaration is being removed to avoid problems of
> incompatibilities.
>
> Resolution:
>
> :collectionName a owl:DatatypeProperty;
> rdfs:comment "The name by which a collection (e.g. series) is known.";
> rdfs:domain :Collection;
> rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label .
>
> Changed to :
>
> :collectionName a owl:DatatypeProperty, owl:Thing;
> rdfs:comment "The name by which a collection (e.g. series) is known.";
> rdfs:domain :Collection .
>
> The updated derived TTL representation is available at
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>
> 3/ EOXXX: Correction in the RDF/OWL representation of the Media Ontology
> in section 7.3
>
> Description:
>
> In the RDF/OWL representation of the Media Ontology, the import reference
> to Dublin Core is broken.
>
> Resolution:
>
> <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"/>
>
> Changed to :
>
> <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://dublincore.org/2008/01/14/dcelements.rdf
> "/>
>
> The updated RDF/OWL representation is available at
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
>
> 4/ EOXXX: Correction in the TTL representation of the Media Ontology in
> section 8
>
> Description:
>
> In the RDF/OWL representation of the Media Ontology, the import reference
> to Dublin Core is broken.
>
> Resolution:
>
> owl:imports dc:;
>
> Changed to :
>
> owl:imports <http://dublincore.org/2008/01/14/dcelements.rdf>;
>
> The updated derived TTL representation is available at
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evain, Jean-Pierre [mailto:evain@ebu.ch]
> Sent: vendredi, 22. mars 2013 09:02
> To: 'Thierry MICHEL'
> Cc: 'Joakim Soderberg'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: MAWG - update RDF
>
> One new errata will actually concern EO1 and will removed the subproperty
> declaration to rdfs:label in bothe the rdf and the derived ttl
>
> Another new errata will be the correction of the import reference to
> dc.rdf.
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: vendredi, 22. mars 2013 08:30
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: 'Joakim Soderberg'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF
>
> And one more thing,
>
> The already existing errata at
> http://www.w3.org/2012/01/mediaont-10-errata.html
>
> are also in the new files ?
> (I havn't check).
>
> Thierry
>
> On 22/03/2013 07:30, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> > Dear Michel,
> >
> > thanks for the instructions. We'll follow your recommendations.
> >
> > I hope the group will agree as the file is otherwsie not validating in
> particular because of a non persistent refernece from Dublin Core. But I
> would of course provide you with the detailed information needed for the
> errata.
> >
> > I guess we'll need to organise a MAWG call soon.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > jean-Pierre
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> > Sent: 21 March 2013 20:44
> > To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> > Cc: 'Joakim Soderberg'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF
> >
> > Jean Pierre,
> >
> >
> > We have those two files included (nested)  in the Ontology for Media
> > Resources 1.0 Recommendation
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#ont-owl
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#ont-ttl
> >
> > and also published at
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
> >
> >
> > If I update these two files there, then there will be a deferent
> > version in the Recommendation.
> >
> > The only way to solve this is to update these two files at
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
> >
> > and publish an errata with these changes at
> > http://www.w3.org/2012/01/mediaont-10-errata.html
> >
> >
> > Therefore I need
> > 1- to have the Group to approve these changes.
> > 2- Know the exact changes to update the errata page.
> >
> > Is this OK ?
> >
> >
> > Thierry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/03/2013 17:13, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> >> Me too and I insist that these are corrections and not changes.
> >>
> >> Best, JP
> >>
> >> From: Joakim Soderberg [mailto:soderberg.pj@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: jeudi, 21. mars 2013 16:40
> >> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> >> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: MAWG - update RDF
> >>
> >> I hope it gets accepted. Thierry, will this have to be published as a
> separate version?
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch
> <mailto:evain@ebu.ch>> wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> A group of MAWG members are making a submission to an RFT from ISO/JPEG
> proposing to adopt our ma-ont ontology.
> >>
> >> This submission contains links to the rdf and ttl files accessible from:
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.rdf
> >> http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont.ttl
> >>
> >> A couple of corrections have proved to be required with no impact on
> the ontology structure:
> >>
> >> 1/ surprisingly the reference to DublinCore in RDF (e.g. used for
> >> comments) was broken and had to be replaced 2/ the collectionName
> property used to be declared as a subclass of rdfs:label but this generates
> problems. Therefore collectionName is now just a dataProperty like for
> title, description, etc.
> >> 3/ we have added a comment saying that the rdf an ttl files take
> precedence over the specification, which contains a copy of the rdf file
> (and we think that the corrections made do not justify going through a
> revision of the specification itself).
> >>
> >> This work has been carried out in collaboration with Pierre-Antoine
> Champin (who also generated the ttl file) and Tobias Buerger.
> >>
> >> The corrected files are attached and we have asked Thierry Michel to
> upload these new versions in place of the existing ones.
> >>
> >> We hope that this is agreeable to all members of the MAWG.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Jean-Pierre
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------
> >>
> >> **************************************************
> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed.
> >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> >> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
> >> swept by the mailgateway
> >> **************************************************
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ---------
> >>
> >> **************************************************
> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed.
> >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> >> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
> >> swept by the mailgateway
> >> **************************************************
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------
> >
> > **************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> > manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
> > swept by the mailgateway
> > **************************************************
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system
> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
> by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>
>
>