Re: Issues in youtube ontology example

Wonsuk,

thanks for your files.
Now published in the Ontology testsuite at

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

Did you review the MediaRSS, TXFeed and Youtube JSON files from the API 
testsuite at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/TestSuite_implementation


Best,

Thierry


Le 10/01/2012 16:05, Wonsuk Lee a écrit :
> Hi. Thierry.
>
> Please find the enclosed files. These include updated three examples
> for MediaRSS, TXFeed and Youtube metadata format.
>
> best regards,
> Wonsuk.
>
>
> 2012/1/7 Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>:
>> Wonsuk,
>>
>> Could you send the updated files ?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> Le 04/01/2012 03:26, Wonsuk Lee a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi. Martin.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for good comments.
>>>
>>> For the ma:hasCompression and ma:hasFormat, I will revise the youtube
>>> ontology example as below.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <ma:hasCompression rdf:parseType="Resource">
>>>
>>> <rdfs:label
>>>
>>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">application/x-shockwa
>>> ve-flash</rdfs:label>
>>>
>>> </ma:hasCompression>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <ma:hasFormat rdf:parseType="Resource">
>>>
>>> <rdfs:label>    application/x-shockwave-flash</rdfs:label>
>>>
>>> </ma:hasFormat>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In addition, your comments are also valuable to other examples I take care
>>> such as MediaRSS [1] and TXF [2] examples.
>>>
>>> Therefore, if you are ok for upper proposal, I will apply these style to
>>> three examples.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/mrss_sam
>>> ple_rdf.rdf
>>>
>>> [2]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/txfeed-s
>>> ample_rdf.rdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Wonsuk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Höffernig, Martin [mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:20 PM
>>> To: Wonsuk Lee; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>> Subject: Issues in youtube ontology example
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Wonsuk,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> While looking at the MA ontology examples, I recognized some issues in
>>> your
>>> youtube [1] example:
>>>
>>> The value of ma:hasCompression is a string. Since ma:hasCompression is an
>>> ObjectProperty, a literal cannot be its value, instead a resource is
>>> expected. Therefore I propose to insert a blank node with the value of
>>> compression as label.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, ma:format is not part of the MA spec and should be changed to
>>> ma:hasFormat.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please address these issues?!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/Youtube-
>>> new-example_rdf.rdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2012 18:39:28 UTC