- From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
- Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:24:08 +0200
- To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi Wonsuk! We had the discussion about the ATOM metadata format, which is actually part of Youtube. For this, we recently got valuable input for the mappings (complete discussion in [1]) from Sebastian working at Salzburg research. Since you were in charge of Youtube, it would be perfect, if you could set up the mapping table on the basis of the information provided by Sebastian. Happy easter, folks. Cheers. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2012Feb/0006.html (mappings nearly in the end of the discussions) _____________________________ Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier Chair of Distributed Information Systems University of Passau Innstr. 43 94032 Passau Room 248 ITZ Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 Fax: +49 851 509 3062 stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/ http://twitter.com/fstegmai _____________________________ Am 06.04.2012 um 02:25 schrieb Wonsuk Lee: > Hi. Thierry. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:03 PM >> To: Wonsuk Lee >> Cc: Daniel Park; Evain, Jean-Pierre; mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media- >> annotation@w3.org >> Subject: Re: (call for review) Schema.org mapping table >> >> >> >> Le 04/04/2012 01:35, Wonsuk Lee a écrit : >>> Hi. Daniel. >>> >>> 2012년 4월 2일 오후 6:09, Daniel Park<soohongp@gmail.com>님의 말: >>>> Members, >>>> >>>> schema.org is newly mapped to our media ontology. We will go through >>>> the mapping during the call tomorrow. Before that, I'd request you all >>>> for the mapping review, and send your opinion and feedback to the >>>> group mailing list. All comments will be able to be used for the >>>> teleconf efficiently. >>>> >>>> youtube mapping: wonsuk are you suppose to get back to us with more >> comments ? >>> >>> Related with this, I sent email to MA mailing list right before. >>> please refer that email. >> >> >> I guess you have answer one of the issues, about wrong targuet audience >> and publisher mapping in the table (now done). >> >> this issue is about the *new You tube* mapping table >> see >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional- >> mappings.html >> > > > You mean should I do this? Right? > > > Best regards, > Wonsuk. > > >> >> Best, >> >> Thierry >> >>> >>> best regards, >>> Wonsuk. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, Daniel. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>>>> published at >>>>> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional- >> mappings.html >>>>> >>>>> Le 02/04/2012 10:14, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I had another exchange with Maric-Carmen, which led to the following >>>>>> additions: >>>>>> >>>>>> - mapping of encodings with ma-ont:relation -> the formats in which >>>>>> content is available >>>>>> - added album to collection >>>>>> >>>>>> I have also added: >>>>>> >>>>>> - ma-ont:relation mapping to thumbnailUrl that links a thumbnail to >> the >>>>>> media resource. >>>>>> - ma-ont:relation mapping to trailer. >>>>>> - ma-ont:relation mapping to associatedArticle. >>>>>> - alternativeHeadline >>>>>> - actor corrected to actors >>>>>> - added playlist to collection >>>>>> - correct Season to TVSeason >>>>>> >>>>>> New version of the table attached. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks-you >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Jean-Pierre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Evain, Jean-Pierre >>>>>> Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 09:14 >>>>>> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre; 'tmichel@w3.org' >>>>>> Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: Schema.org mapping table >>>>>> >>>>>> I am resending the file. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW, I did CTRL-F5 ;--) The one I see is not the one attached. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry about this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean-Pierre >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Evain, Jean-Pierre [mailto:evain@ebu.ch] >>>>>> Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 09:10 >>>>>> To: 'tmichel@w3.org' >>>>>> Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: Schema.org mapping table >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Thierry, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not sure it is the latest one as they should be more mappings to >>>>>> contributor. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me check if I sent the right one. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean-Pierre >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] >>>>>> Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 08:41 >>>>>> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre >>>>>> Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: Re: Schema.org mapping table >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean Pierre, >>>>>> >>>>>> Your revised version of the mapping table for schema.org is published >> at >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional- >> mappings.html >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thierry. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 28/03/2012 20:29, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Thierry, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please find a revised version of the mapping table for schema.org. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mari-Carmen sent me her comments but I must admit that I can't agree >> with >>>>>>> most :--( e.g. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - encodingFormat should map to relation and not to compression or >> the >>>>>>> equivalent of a wrapper as I originally suggested >>>>>>> - or add contentRating to rating when the schema.org semantics >> clearly >>>>>>> point to parentalGuidance mapping >>>>>>> - or TVSeries or TVSeason are not collections >>>>>>> - or only map contributor (and not actor, producer, etc.) >>>>>>> - Etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Putting all these comments in the table would make it very messy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I therefore proposed to Mari-Carmen that she forwards her comments >> to the >>>>>>> group for review in a webex, one by one. However, she reminded me of >>>>>>> populating the mapping accuracy column as well as the datatypes, >> which I >>>>>>> have now done. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This gave me the opportunity to review the table and I have >> identified >>>>>>> missing mappings. I have also removed the CreativeWork root in the >>>>>>> expressions as ma-ont obviously describe a media content equivalent >> to a >>>>>>> CreativeWork. Several contributors roles are repeated in different >>>>>>> schema.org branches like in Movie or MusicRecording or TVEpisode or >> even >>>>>>> TVSeries and TVSeason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The revised table is attached and still need to be review against >> the >>>>>>> comments from Mari-Carmen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't do more on Mari-Carmen comments but I have invited >> her >>>>>>> to share these comments with the group and I am looking for the >> opportunity >>>>>>> to discuss them one by one in the group. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jean-Pierre >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] >>>>>>> Sent: mardi, 27. mars 2012 14:09 >>>>>>> To: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es >>>>>>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org >>>>>>> Subject: Schema.org mapping table >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mari-Carmen, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jean Pierre has provided an initial schema.org mapping table to >>>>>>> complement our Ontology spec. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/addition >>>>>>> al-mappings.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As you had volunteer to collaborate to this work, could you please >>>>>>> look at it and finalize it ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thierry >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ************************************************** >>>>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >>>>>>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are >>>>>>> addressed. >>>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system >>>>>>> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has >> been >>>>>>> swept by the mailgateway >>>>>>> ************************************************** >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --------- >>>>>> >>>>>> ************************************************** >>>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended >>>>>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are >> addressed. >>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system >>>>>> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been >> swept >>>>>> by the mailgateway >>>>>> ************************************************** >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --------- >>>>>> >>>>>> ************************************************** >>>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended >>>>>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are >> addressed. >>>>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system >>>>>> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been >> swept >>>>>> by the mailgateway >>>>>> ************************************************** >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Soohong Daniel Park >>>> Samsung Electronics, SWC >>>> >>> >>> >>>
Received on Friday, 6 April 2012 09:24:46 UTC