- From: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:47:48 +0200
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear Jean-Pierre, thank you for your response. Pellet is not the reference, this reasoner is just one among others. However, I personally prefer to use this reasoner because of its reasoner capabilities. I will try to explain my interpretation of the ontology inconsistency: The following resource is an instance of ma:Collection. <http://www.dummy.ch/News/16Jan2011/Items/20110116-PNN-0428-528229/> a ma-ont:Document , ma-ont:Collection ; ma-ont:locator "http://www.dummy.ch/News/16Jan2011/Items/20110116-PNN-0428-528229/index.html"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI> . Since this resource has a ma:locator property (Domain: ma:MediaResource) it will be inferred as an instance of class ma:MediaResource. Furthermore, ma:MediaResource and ma:Collection are disjoint classes and the ontology is consistent. Best, Martin ________________________________________ Von: Evain, Jean-Pierre [evain@ebu.ch] Gesendet: Montag, 5. September 2011 17:02 An: Höffernig, Martin; tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org Betreff: RE : Checking MA mapping examples Dear Martin, I have checked the EBUCore instance with different tools and couldn't find errors. I would need more information than this to try and fix errors what Pellet apparently detected. I'll start by checking the collection issue. Why do others tools not find these errors? Is Pellet the absolute reference? Why? Regards, Jean-Pierre ________________________________________ De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Höffernig, Martin [Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at] Date d'envoi : lundi, 5. septembre 2011 16:35 À : tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org Objet : Checking MA mapping examples Dear all, I have finished checking all mapping examples with Protégé and Pellet. Here is my list of issues: - Missing comment line containing creation and version information (cf. [1]) - In some cases, datatype values are represented as strings rather than xsd:decimal - Sme datatype values include units, which should be removed (eg. Kbps) - In 3gp-Example-v4.rdf the xml:base directive should be removed in order to import the ma ontology correctly - According to Pellet, the EBUCore example is inconsistent. Possible reason is that at least one instance is a member of two disjoint classes (MediaResource and Collection). - Cablelabs 1. 1 example is not RDF valid I propose to discuss these issues during the upcoming F2F meeting. [1]: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples.html Best, Martin -- Martin Höffernig Audiovisual Media Group DIGITAL – Institute for Information and Communication Technologies JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AUSTRIA phone: +43-316-876-1184 general fax: +43-316-876-1191 web: http://www.joanneum.at/digital e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at<mailto:martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 11:51:26 UTC