- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:25:08 +0200
- To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Right, just do the table, Note and Ack sections. thierry Le 19/10/2011 10:20, Florian Stegmaier a écrit : > Hi Thierry, > > ok, i will update the table and Ack section! Status etc is not possible for me to set in the DEV space. > > Best. > _____________________________ > Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier > Chair of Distributed Information Systems > University of Passau > Innstr. 43 > 94032 Passau > > Room 248 ITZ > > Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 > Fax: +49 851 509 3062 > > stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de > https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/ > http://twitter.com/fstegmai > _____________________________ > > Am 19.10.2011 um 10:19 schrieb Thierry MICHEL: > >> >> And also the Note is not updated >> >> Later versions of this document may include additional status codes or other changes. >> >> change to >> >> Later versions of this document may include additional status codes. >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> >> Later versions of this document may include additional status codes or other changes. >> >> Le 19/10/2011 10:14, Thierry MICHEL a écrit : >>> OOps, here is the diff file ... >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2008%2FWebVideo%2FAnnotations%2Fdrafts%2FAPI10%2FCR%2FOverview.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2F2008%2Fvideo%2Fmediaann%2Fmediaont-api-1.0%2Fmediaont-api-1.0.html >>> >>> >>> >>> Looking more into your edits >>> >>> You have not updated the following lines in the table >>> >>> 400 Bad Request syntactical error with respect to the GET method used >>> >>> change to >>> >>> 400 Bad Request syntactical error >>> >>> 562 Property not supported only a subset of GET methods for properties >>> implemented >>> >>> change to >>> >>> 562 Property not supported a subset of properties implemented >>> >>> >>> >>> Thierry. >>> >>> Le 19/10/2011 09:59, Thierry MICHEL a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 19/10/2011 08:30, Florian Stegmaier a écrit : >>>>> Hi Thierry! >>>>> >>>>> I have reflected your edits regarding the API section into the DEV >>>>> space: >>>>> >>>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html#api-status-codes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are there any further edits to do? >>>> >>>> I had updates the Acknowledgements >>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/CR/Overview.html#acknowledgements >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> And Status of this document section. >>>> And This, latest and previous versions. . >>>> >>>> >>>> I have run a diff of the two version >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/CR/Overview.html >>>> >>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The diif analysis seems wrong: >>>> Curiously it reports diffs that are not different in the two documents >>>> ;-(( >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Florian >>>>> _____________________________ >>>>> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier >>>>> Chair of Distributed Information Systems >>>>> University of Passau >>>>> Innstr. 43 >>>>> 94032 Passau >>>>> >>>>> Room 248 ITZ >>>>> >>>>> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 >>>>> Fax: +49 851 509 3062 >>>>> >>>>> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de >>>>> https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/ >>>>> http://twitter.com/fstegmai >>>>> _____________________________ >>>>> >>>>> Am 18.10.2011 um 14:26 schrieb Thierry MICHEL: >>>>> >>>>>> Yves, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have discussed this issue during the MAWG telecon. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> These status code are not on the HTTP level, but on a layer on top of >>>>>> it. >>>>>> >>>>>> As these are on different layers, we have decided to remove the >>>>>> wording and references to HTTP to avoid any confusion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Therefore the "4.7 API Status Codes" section >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/CR/Overview.html#api-status-codes >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The section does not mentions HTTP nor refers to it. >>>>>> The intro paragraph now says: >>>>>> >>>>>> [This section introduces a set of status codes for the defined API to >>>>>> indicate the system behavior. As described in section 4.4, the status >>>>>> code is returned as one of the attributes of the MediaAnnotation >>>>>> object returned by a method call to the API. These status codes are >>>>>> used on the API level, and applied to either client side or server >>>>>> side implementations.] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you see a coincidence between the Numerical Code and the HTTP >>>>>> staus code, it is only a coincidence ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope that this resolution fits your comment. Let us know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thierry. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 18/10/2011 11:37, Yves Lafon a écrit : >>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yves, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are still stuck with this HTTP status codes issue, blocking the >>>>>>>> API >>>>>>>> spec moving to CR. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Following your last comment >>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Oct/0042.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Werner has responded to it on Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:22:34 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Oct/0043.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you please give us a response has we need your approval on a >>>>>>>> resolution to move forward. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, errors and successful responses are all tunnelled in HTTP >>>>>>> 200, so >>>>>>> basically you are partially reinventing SOAP (well, not even, SOAP 1.1 >>>>>>> used HTTP 500 for SOAP faults), if the group wants to keeps thing as >>>>>>> is, >>>>>>> at least confusion should be cleared about fault codes mimicking HTTP >>>>>>> but being used in an antithetic way to HTTP. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a Media Annotation WG telecon today at 13h00 (French time). >>>>>>>> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") >>>>>>>> IRC channel: #mediaann >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could you please join this telecon to come to a resolution? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, sorry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, Thierry. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 08:25:41 UTC