- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Thierry MICHEL wrote: > > Yves, > > We are still stuck with this HTTP status codes issue, blocking the API spec > moving to CR. > > Following your last comment > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Oct/0042.html > > Werner has responded to it on Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:22:34 > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Oct/0043.html > > Could you please give us a response has we need your approval on a resolution > to move forward. Well, errors and successful responses are all tunnelled in HTTP 200, so basically you are partially reinventing SOAP (well, not even, SOAP 1.1 used HTTP 500 for SOAP faults), if the group wants to keeps thing as is, at least confusion should be cleared about fault codes mimicking HTTP but being used in an antithetic way to HTTP. > We have a Media Annotation WG telecon today at 13h00 (French time). > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") > IRC channel: #mediaann > > Could you please join this telecon to come to a resolution? No, sorry. > > Best, Thierry. > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 09:37:51 UTC