Re: follow up on the discussion in HTML5 about metadata access

The ePub 3.0 document content model is HTML5.  HTML5 UA's will be used
to render ePub publications, embedded in hardware or software eBook
readers.  Note that ePub is a container (like ZIP) that contains HTML5
content and associated resources, which may include any audio and
video referenced in the content.  In the eBook world, content is
downloaded and read on a local device.

mark



On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> EPUB is not HTML, so it does not get interpreted by a HTML UA and
> therefore not exposed through the HTML IDL. Even if there is HTML
> somewhere in EPUB, you are not delivering a HTML file to the Web
> browser but an EPUB file. If you want to interpret EPUB markup in a
> Web browser you need a plugin.
>
> Silvia.
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote:
>> HTML is a markup language that can be (and is!) used in MANY DIFFERENT areas.  To limit it (and it's design/development) to the "Web" is short-sighted and will only lead to interoperability problems in the future.
>>
>> Leonard
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Henri Sivonen [mailto:hsivonen@iki.fi]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:37 AM
>> To: Leonard Rosenthol
>> Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer; tmichel@w3.org; public-html@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: follow up on the discussion in HTML5 about metadata access
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:52 -0700, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
>>> > Right now, all use cases discussed on the HTML WG list were solvable
>>> > with server-side APIs.
>>> >
>>> That is NOT true, Silvia!
>>>
>>> I raised a number of use cases for non-browser-based UAs - for example
>>> EPUB viewers - where server-side was NOT an option.
>>
>> Why would an .epub book need to be able to introspect its own metadata
>> using a script?
>>
>> As for viewers, if the viewer wants to do stuff with metadata, it can
>> implement whatever interfaces it wants for its own private use. They
>> don't have to be standardized or exposed to scripts provided by the book
>> itself.
>>
>> (I tend to get skeptical when a Web API is motivated by non-Web uses.
>> The W3C has been down that road before. Has it ever been a good road?)
>>
>> --
>> Henri Sivonen
>> hsivonen@iki.fi
>> http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 07:06:45 UTC