- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:23:55 +1000
- To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On 02/05/2011, at 5:34 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, > Here is the agenda for next call. > > Joakim and and Daniel are not available, therefore they ask me to chair this meeting. > > /Thierry > > ------------------------------- > > 1. Convene > Media Annotations WG > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial > numbers: > France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03 > UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152 > IRC channel: #mediaann > Tuesday 2011-03-29 11:00-12:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm > *13:00*) > Regrets: Joakim, Daniel > Chair: Thierry > Scribe: volunteer? > > Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2011/05/03-mediaann-minutes.html > > 2. Next meeting > 2011/05/10 > > 3. Items > [A] Action items: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open > > ------------------ > > > [B] Proposal for response to the HTML5 WG, > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0059.html > - answer from Silvia saying she still thought the API wasn't useful for Web UA and also that she had no interest in RDF. > > > - answer from Danny Ayers saying he supports a generic API access (as in name-value pairs), but concerns about potential > adoption. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0069.html > > Unless you can demonstrate good use cases, browsers won't be compelled to implement anything. You might focus your discussion on that. 1-2 serious use cases would suffice - don't make many vague ones. Cheers, Silvia. > [C] Metadata format files for the Ontology > Slot to discuss problems or issues > > Assigned editors: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Feb/0087.html > > > [D] Revision of the API document. > > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html > > What is the status of this document ? Is it ready for 2nd Last Call ? > > [E] Ontology document. > > getting rid of xsd:dateTime ? Is this updated ? > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0020.html > > is this updated ? > > > > 4. AOB > > > /Thierry >
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 08:31:33 UTC