- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:23:55 +1000
- To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On 02/05/2011, at 5:34 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is the agenda for next call.
>
> Joakim and and Daniel are not available, therefore they ask me to chair this meeting.
>
> /Thierry
>
> -------------------------------
>
> 1. Convene
> Media Annotations WG
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial
> numbers:
> France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03
> UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152
> IRC channel: #mediaann
> Tuesday 2011-03-29 11:00-12:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm
> *13:00*)
> Regrets: Joakim, Daniel
> Chair: Thierry
> Scribe: volunteer?
>
> Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2011/05/03-mediaann-minutes.html
>
> 2. Next meeting
> 2011/05/10
>
> 3. Items
> [A] Action items:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
>
> ------------------
>
>
> [B] Proposal for response to the HTML5 WG,
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0059.html
> - answer from Silvia saying she still thought the API wasn't useful for Web UA and also that she had no interest in RDF.
>
>
> - answer from Danny Ayers saying he supports a generic API access (as in name-value pairs), but concerns about potential
> adoption.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0069.html
>
>
Unless you can demonstrate good use cases, browsers won't be compelled to implement anything. You might focus your discussion on that. 1-2 serious use cases would suffice - don't make many vague ones.
Cheers,
Silvia.
> [C] Metadata format files for the Ontology
> Slot to discuss problems or issues
>
> Assigned editors:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Feb/0087.html
>
>
> [D] Revision of the API document.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html
>
> What is the status of this document ? Is it ready for 2nd Last Call ?
>
> [E] Ontology document.
>
> getting rid of xsd:dateTime ? Is this updated ?
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Apr/0020.html
>
> is this updated ?
>
>
>
> 4. AOB
>
>
> /Thierry
>
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 08:31:33 UTC