RE: datatype properties' range

Pierre-Antoine,

I am reading a lot of material on the use of rdfs:literal combined with xml:lang. I see all sort of opinions sometimes negative.

Still, I guess if we go for literal it would need to be applied more systematically and not only to strings probably using typed literals??

Jean-Pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: Evain, Jean-Pierre 
Sent: mercredi, 9. mars 2011 19:31
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre; 'Pierre-Antoine Champin'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: datatype properties' range

Pierre-Antoine,

If I get you right you want to type the literal with a language or...?

Regards,

Jean-Pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
Sent: mercredi, 9. mars 2011 19:17
To: 'Pierre-Antoine Champin'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: datatype properties' range

Pierre-Antoine,

About changing 'xsd:string' to rdfs:literal.

In this case would it be logical to make a similar change to datatype properties with e.g. integer content?

There would also likely be a need to check compliance with OWL-RL or another profile, if we care?

Regards,

Jean-Pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pierre-Antoine Champin
Sent: mercredi, 9. mars 2011 16:44
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: datatype properties' range

Hi all,

in the RDF ontology, all datatype properties with textual content have 
range xsd:string.

I think using rdfs:Literal instead would be beneficial, as we could 
(optionally) add a language tag to those textual values.

I mention it because the API document allows to attach a language 
information to virtually any property value. This would be a nice way to 
encode this in RDF as well.

   pa


-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************

Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 19:30:07 UTC