W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

RE : Metadata formats examples must be valid

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:29:54 +0200
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010F5A1BC471@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
I'll further fake some of the IRI and provide two new files for EBUCore and EBUNML2/IPTC.

I have been using three different applications to generate these files... There is really an issue with RDF/OWL validation. Wider adoption will require this being worked out, really.



EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: Your RDF document validated successfully

EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: Your RDF document validated successfully

TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: Your RDF document validated successfully


EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: Problem with some URI formats

EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: Problem with some URI formats

TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: Syntax validated OK




TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: OWL FULL YES


EBUCoreXML_2_MaOntRDF_ITM528229.owl: Problem of non absolute IRI

EBUNML2XML_2_MaOntRDF_v10_ITM528228.owl: Problem of non absolute IRI

TVAXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22.owl: The ontology and all of its imports are in the OWL 2 profile

De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
Date d'envoi : mercredi, 15. juin 2011 18:49
 : public-media-annotation@w3.org
Objet : Metadata formats examples must be valid

Hi all,

Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media
Resources 1.0


I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the
associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties.

Here are my remarks:

1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML
validation (well formed document)[1].
--> XML documents MUST be well formed.

2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2]
--> RDF documents MUST be valid

3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong:
<rdf:Description rdf:about= ....

--> Please make sure the corresponding URL are right.

Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements
are fulfilled.

We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in
ERCIM/Sophia. Therefore please provide valid documents before this event
28/29 june.


This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway

Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 17:30:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:48 UTC