- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:20:08 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com, soohongp@gmail.com, Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@dfki.de>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Sylvia, I have updated the 3 HTML tables with your info. I am not sure about my edits, please verify, would be easier if you do it, really. It still have some issues: OGG ----- http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ogg-table 1-fragments and namedFragments are marked as "N/A" in the "Relation" column and are used in the RDF file marked as "Yes" in the "RDF tested" column. This seems not right. 2- not sure what to put in the following title: second and third lines 3- The following Descriptive Properties (Core Set) dont have a equivalence in the "Ogg properties" column frameSize duration samplingRate frameRate bitRate WebM container -------------- http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#webm-tablet 1- not sure what to put in the following identifier: second and third lines title: second line language: second and third lines 2- The following Descriptive Properties (Core Set) dont have a equivalence in the "Ogg properties" column averageBitRate Le 28/07/2011 05:00, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >> >> For OGG >> >> TITLE --> title (RDF-tested:Yes) >> DATE: --> date (RDF-tested:Yes) >> LOCATION: --> location (RDF-tested:Yes) >> COPYRIGHT: --> copyright (RDF-tested:Yes) > > please make this: > > TRACK NAME: audio_1 --> identifier > TRACK NAME: video_1 --> identifier > TITLE --> title (RDF-tested:Yes) > URL: DougExample.ogv --> locator > ORGANIZATION: Web Directions South --> creator > CONTACT: silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com --> creator > DATE: --> date (RDF-tested:Yes) > LOCATION: --> location (RDF-tested:Yes) > COPYRIGHT: --> copyright (RDF-tested:Yes) > Media Fragment URIs: > DougExample.ogv#track=audio_1, DougExample.ogv#track=video_1 --> fragments > DougExample.ogv#chapter=introduction, DougExample.ogv#chapter=twitter > --> named fragments > Video-Width: 352, Video-Height: 576--> frameSize > video/theora, audio/vorbis --> compression > 55.488 --> duration > video/ogg -> format > 48000 HZ --> samplingRate > 25 fps --> frameRate > 285.210 kbps --> bitRate > 2 --> numTracks > > > In fact, I just notice that the CONTACT field is not in > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ogg-table > , so could be added there under "creator" next to "ORGANIZATION". > > >> For OGG container >> >> none. > > It's the same as above, not none. See > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ogg-cont-table > . > > >> For WebM >> >> Title: --> title (RDF-tested:Yes) >> Duration: --> duration (RDF-tested:Yes) >> Language: --> language (RDF-tested:Yes) > > > please make this: > > TrackUID: 1 and 2 --> identifier > Track number: 1 --> identifier > Name: video-1, audio-1 --> identifier > Title: W3C and Twitter --> title > Language: en --> language > Locator: DougExample.webm --> locator > Duration: 55.500s (00:00:55.500) --> duration > Media Fragment URIs: > DougExample.webm#track=audio-1, DougExample.webm#track=video-1 --> fragments > DougExample.webm#chapter=introduction, > DougExample.webm#chapter=twitter --> named fragments > Pixel width: 352, Pixel height: 576 --> frameSize > video/vp8, audio/vorbis --> compression > Duration: 55.500s --> duration > video/webm -> format > 48000 HZ --> samplingRate > 25 fps --> frameRate > 75.443 kbps, 285.210 kbps --> bitRate > 2 --> numTracks > > Hope this helps. > > >> Please add the appropriate information in these 3 HTML files. >> >> Now for your 2 RDF files >> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_ogv.rdf >> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.rdf >> >> Looking at them, they seem fine (with my very small RDF/OWL expertise) >> >> I have tried to open it with Protégé. >> I get a long list of java.awt errors. >> >> see attached screen shot >> >> I have no idea what this is. I have zero expertise with Protégé. Maybe >> someone can help here. > > > Yes, I think whoever the Protege expert is should check this for all > of the files. > > > Cheers, > Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 14:20:00 UTC