RE : RE : RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update

Then in this case for identifier I would say "no, not applicable".

I want ambiguity to be lift off as EBUCore of course could have tested identifier. It is already ambiguous enough to say 'tested' -> against what: RDF only?

Best regards,

Jean-Pierre
________________________________________
De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
Date d'envoi : mercredi, 20. juillet 2011 15:57
À : Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org
Objet : Re: RE : RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update

Le 20/07/2011 15:34, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> <<<Prise de tete>>>

???


For clarification
in the mapping table

http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ebu-table


I now read for "identifier"
N.A (removed from RDF)

shouln't it be "no" ?
as there is an exact mapping, but not used (tested) in the RDF.


>
> Voilà
>
>
> ________________________________________
> De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 20. juillet 2011 15:15
> À : Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Objet : Re: RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update
>
> Le 19/07/2011 20:37, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> The updated webpage.
>>
>> I believe I am done.
>
> Sorry but in the HTML file you have sent, the "Tested" column is empty.
>
> Thierry
>
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email
> message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 14:06:36 UTC