Re: POWDER example

Again, should I update this in the spec ?

Le 20/01/2011 21:29, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
> OK,
> Should I update this in the spec ?
>
> Thierry
>
> Le 19/01/2011 17:30, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> having a look at the POWDER example in
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#example1
>>
>>
>>
>> it seems to me that it contains some errors related to the use of RDF
>> and related to the new structure of the ma: RDF ontology. I think it
>> should read:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <powder xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder#"
>> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>> xmlns:ma="http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont#">
>>
>> <attribution>
>> <issuedby src="http://example.com/company.rdf#me" />
>> <issued>2007-12-14T00:00:00</issued>
>> </attribution>
>>
>> <dr>
>> <iriset>
>> <includehosts>example.com</includehosts>
>> <includepathstartswith>/movies/sci-fi/</includepathstartswith>
>> </iriset>
>>
>> <descriptorset>
>> <ma:hasGenre
>> rdf:resource="http://example.com/ontology.rdf#sf" />
>> <ma:hasPublisher
>> rdf:resource="http://example.com/company.rdf#me" />
>> <displaytext>Movies in this section of the website are all in the
>> science fiction genre</displaytext>
>> <displayicon src="http://example.com/sf-icon.png" />
>> </descriptorset>
>> </dr>
>> </powder>
>>
>> changes:
>> - added the xmlns:rdf declaration
>> - changed genre to ma:hasGenre
>> - changed publisher to ma:hasPublisher
>> - in the ma:* properties, changed src to rdf:resource
>>
>> NB: it passes the POWDER validator at
>> http://i-sieve.com/powdervalidator/
>> which the current example doesnt.
>>
>> pa
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 08:35:11 UTC