- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:26:50 +0100
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Le 19/01/2011 11:09, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit : > Looks good to me. A few comments: > > * is it necessary that section 7 *and* subsections 7.2 and 7.3 be marked > as normative? You are right I have removed normative for subsections 7.2 and 7.3 see http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ont-RDF > > * the POWDER example in section 6 is (or should be, I think) related to > the RDF ontology in section 7; shouldn't both sections be swapped? It could. the issue is that section 7 is normative and section 6 examples there are informative. > > pa > > > On 01/19/2011 10:27 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >> >> Pierre Antoine, >> >> i have added your >> input in section 7 >> >> see >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ont-RDF >> >> >> Let me know if it is OK. >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> Le 14/01/2011 22:02, Pierre-Antoine Champin a écrit : >>> ben non, il en restait une :-( >>> >>> a+ >>> >>> pa >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:27:16 UTC