- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:44:12 -0800
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
I will send out a further email trying to bring clarity to the compression attribute; I do object and I think it is problematic. Not least, the latest spec. integrates part of a draft suggestion from me, which was superseded by an improvement that Jean-Pierre proposed. I have heard that there is a 'poll' but I am unable to find it. Can someone give me a pointer? Thanks On Feb 8, 2011, at 13:34 , Thierry MICHEL wrote: > Hi all, > > Today during the MAWG telecon, the participants have agreed on two resolutions: > > 1- Keep the compression property(attName="compression", attValue="URI" | "String") refer to the minutes for more details. > > 2- Move the Ontology spec to 2nd LC. > the draft is currently available at > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/2LC-mediaont-1.0.html > > I you want to object to these two resolutions please voice before tomorrow night. > > Else the spec will be published as a 1nd LC on Thursday. > > Thierry > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 21:44:46 UTC