- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:27:04 +0100
- To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Le 08/02/2011 16:06, Bailer, Werner a écrit : >> DONE >> >> see >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont- >> 1.0.html#d0e7837 > > Thanks. > >> But maybe I should remove the Xpath expression in the MPEG-7 column and >> leave only the name ... > > For the elements this makes sense, but not for the attributes (e.g. leaving just "@id" does not make sense). I could leave the element and attribute name like: Frame/@width Else I can leave it as is, and we can talk about it latter. > > Werner > >> >> Le 08/02/2011 15:29, Bailer, Werner a écrit : >>>> Werner, >>>> >>>> It has been always like this I think. >>>> This was already the case for an earlier version >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/#d0e6711 >>>> >>>> Should I just copy the XPath from the MPEG-7 column into the Xpath >>>> colomn ? >>> >>> I think that's the best solution. >>> >>> Werner >>> >>>> Le 08/02/2011 14:21, Bailer, Werner a écrit : >>>>> Dear Thierry, >>>>> >>>>> When working on the TTML mapping table, I saw that the XPath column >>>> of MPEG-7 says "N/A" for all elements, while the MPEG-7 column >> contains >>>> not only the name of the target element, but a relative XPath. Not >> sure >>>> when this happened ... >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Werner >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media- >>>>>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL >>>>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 03. Februar 2011 09:56 >>>>>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: ACTION ALL to review the Ontology spec before 2nd Last >> CAll >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Please review carefully the Ontology draft >>>>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont- >> 1.0.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This will be the *last chance* for edits before going to 2nd Last >>>>>> Call. >>>>>> >>>>>> During the next MAWG telecon, the group will take the decision to >>>> move >>>>>> to 2nd Last Call. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please report to the mailing list your feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thierry. >>>>> >>>
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 15:27:31 UTC