- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:00:47 +0100
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
- CC: "'tmichel@w3.org'" <tmichel@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On 02/03/2011 09:14 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote: > It is not wrong but it is not elegant. URI#Name is a URI. The > original definition was right. As I said no need for modification. > Only add the example in the semantics. +1 there is no conceptual difference between a hash-uri and a slash-uri. We should not constrain that in the ontology. An example should be fine. pa > > Jean-Pierre > > -----Original Message----- From: Thierry MICHEL > [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] Sent: jeudi, 3. février 2011 09:09 To: Evain, > Jean-Pierre Cc: David Singer; Joakim Söderberg; Daniel Park; > public-media-annotation@w3.org Subject: Re: RE : RE : Recapitulation > of ma:format vs. ma:compression. > > Updated to: > > compression (attName="compression", attValue="URI#Name" | "String") > > see > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#core-property-lists > > > > Thierry > > > > Le 31/01/2011 07:28, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : >> Hi David, >> >> I see you had a safe trip back. Me too but I arrived quite late in >> Geneva with Touradj. >> >> As discussed, fine by me as # constructs are URI and is directly >> compatible with the way the ontology has been written. >> >> However only one additional comment: I would suggest we recommend >> the use of ea dereferencable URIs, which use a URL basis instead of >> namespaces. For example, EBU Skos classification schemes are >> available as permanent web resources and use URL based URIs. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jean-Pierre ________________________________________ De : >> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org >> [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de David Singer >> [singer@apple.com] Date d'envoi : samedi, 29. janvier 2011 23:26 À >> : tmichel@w3.org Cc : Joakim Söderberg; Daniel Park; >> public-media-annotation@w3.org Objet : Re: RE : Recapitulation of >> ma:format vs. ma:compression. >> >> In further discussion, it seems that using anchor syntax and a # as >> the separator is cleaner. Can we change to >> >>>> attValue="URI#Name" >> >>>> compression="urn:example-org:codingnames2010#ITU-H264" >>>> compression="http://example.net/standards/codecs#G711" >> >> with corresponding changes to the text? >> >> On Jan 29, 2011, at 23:28 , Thierry MICHEL wrote: >> >>> >>>> compression >>>> >>>> (attName="compression", attValue="URI" | "String") >>>> >>>> The compression type used. For container files (e.g., >>>> QuickTime, AVI), the compression is not defined by the format, >>>> as a container file can have several tracks that each use >>>> different encodings. In such a case, several compression >>>> instances SHOULD be used. Thus, querying the compression >>>> property of the track media fragments will return different >>>> values for each track fragment. Note: it is possible to use an >>>> extendedMIME type as the value for this property, see [RFC >>>> 4281]. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> suggested change to >>>> >>>> compression >>>> >>>> (attName="compression", attValue="URI, String") >>>> >>>> The compression type used. For container files (e.g., >>>> QuickTime, AVI), the compression is not defined by the format, >>>> as a container file can have several tracks that each use >>>> different encodings. In such a case, several compression >>>> instances SHOULD be used. Thus, querying the compression >>>> property of the track media fragments will return different >>>> values for each track fragment. The indicator is a pair of >>>> values, separated by a comma. The first is a URI that >>>> identifies the naming convention used for the second parameter, >>>> which is a string. For some container files, the format >>>> parameter can also carry an extended MIME type to document >>>> this; see [RFC 4281] for one such instance. >>>> >>>> Examples: compression="urn:example-org:codingnames2010, >>>> ITU-H264" compression="http://example.net/standards/codecs, >>>> G711" where ITU-H264 and G711 are defined by example.org (who >>>> also defined a URN to identify their naming conventions), and >>>> by example.net (who use a URL to identify theirs). >>>> >>> >>> >>> Updated the compression Statement. >>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#core-property-lists >>> >>> >>> For the examples; I have added a link to the following section, which contains the examples. >>> >>> 5.1.3.1 Examples for the compression property >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Thierry >>> >> >> David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 09:01:19 UTC