- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:48:45 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@dfki.de>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Le 30/12/2011 13:58, Felix Sasaki a écrit : > 2011/12/30 Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> > >> During the current AC Rep review of the Ontology spec , a company >> requested the following updates before going to REC. >> >> We should address these two items: >> >> 1. Updating the Exif ontology reference to the Exif 2.3 release. >> >> 2. Reviewing the new CIPA Exif Draft "Exif 2.3 metadata for XMP", >> http://www.cipa.jp/english/**hyoujunka/kikaku/cipa_e_**kikaku.html<http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/cipa_e_kikaku.html>which assigns XMP properties to each of the Exif properties, and validate >> that the W3C MAWG ontology is consistent with this work. >> > > I did a short analysis of > http://www.cipa.jp/english/hyoujunka/kikaku/pdf/DC-X010_E.pdf > I don't see any inconsistencies between the "Exif 2.3 metadata for XMP" > mappings and the MAWG mappings. The latter are more general in some cases, > e.g. date / time related values in XMP are mapped to "ISO date format" in > MAWG http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#xmp-table > but this is no inconsistency, just a generalization. Thanks for your review. This is good news. If I understand correctly, for the "Exif 2.3 metadata for XMP", this has no particular impact on our Ontology spec or our Ontology testsuite ? Any updates needed ? any new reference ? For the second issue, does Updating the Exif ontology reference to the Exif 2.3 release has an impact on the exif mapping table or the test suite exif example ? Best, Thierry.
Received on Friday, 30 December 2011 16:49:06 UTC