- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:58:57 +1100
- To: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
- Cc: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
What differences are you referring to? Feel free to fix whatever you see is wrong with it. I did the original file to cover a WebM example as a favor to the group while I was a member and some things had to be twisted to pass the tools. The original may have more information that wasn't able to be encoded into turtle. Cheers, Silvia. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at> wrote: > Dear Silvia, Thierry, > > > > while looking at MA ontology examples in the testsuite, I found out that the > RDF version [1] and the Turtle version [2] of the WebM example do not > represent the same underlying RDF model. Maybe something went wrong during > the copying or editing process. > > Can you please address this issue!? > > > > [1]: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.rdf > > [2]: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DougExample_webm.ttl > > > > Best, > > Martin > > > > -- > > Martin Höffernig > > Audiovisual Media Group > > DIGITAL – Institute for Information and Communication Technologies > > > > JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz, AUSTRIA > > phone: +43-316-876-1184 > > general fax: +43-316-876-1191 > > web: http://www.joanneum.at/digital > e-mail: martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at > >
Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 01:59:48 UTC