RE: ACTION-408, description of "rating"

Dear Joakim,

Just a proposal for a small change to your text:

The rating value (e.g., customer rating, review, audience appreciation), specified by ...

Best regards,
Werner

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joakim Söderberg
Sent: Sonntag, 17. April 2011 20:24
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: ACTION-408, description of "rating"

Hello,
I suggest we add something to the description of "rating" in order to distinguish from "targetAudience":

Proposal:

The rating value based on for example user votes or reviews, specified by a tuple defining the rating value, an optional rating person or organization defined as either a URI (recommended best practice) or as plain text, and an optional voting range. The voting range can optionally be used to define the minimum and maximum values that the rating can have.

Old:

A tuple defining the rating value, an optional rating person or organization defined as either a URI (recommended best practice) or as plain text, and an optional voting range. The voting range can optionally be used to define the minimum and maximum values that the rating can have.

Opinions?

/Joakim