- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 15:30:58 +0530
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, "ecm@list.ebu.ch" <ecm@list.ebu.ch>
Hi Jean-Pierre, On 03/30/2011 01:14 PM, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote: > (...) These two ontologies offer maximum compatibility with MA-ONT very nice :) > I have done the exercise to define the equivalence between the > classes and properties, which is really easy in the above > circumstances. However, I am facing a dilemma. Should I declare the > equivalences in a separate 'mapping ontology' pointing to the > EBUCore, MA-ONT and NML-G2 ontologies as remote resources, or > 'import' them within their own namespace in one ontology containing > the equivalence declarations? not sure what you mean by "pointing to X as a remote resource", nor by "importint X in its own namespace"... could you provide a short example of both approach? pa
Received on Sunday, 3 April 2011 08:13:05 UTC