Re: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-11-30

Dear all,

i have to send my regrets - i am traveling to SAMT [1]. I will present our reference implementation there.

Cheers,
Florian

[1] http://www.samt2010.org/

Am 29.11.2010 um 09:02 schrieb Bailer, Werner:

> Dear Joakim,
> 
> A remark about the time: According to [1] it's at 12:00 UTC, not 11:00 (which nonetheless is 13:00 CET in winter ...)
> 
> Best regards,
> Werner
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joakim Söderberg
>> Sent: Sonntag, 28. November 2010 19:52
>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-11-30
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Here is the agenda for Tuesday:
>> 
>> -------------------------------
>> 1. Convene
>> Media Annotations WG
>> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG")
>> Alternative dial numbers:
>> France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03
>> UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152
>> IRC channel: #mediaann
>> Tuesday 2010-11-30 11:00-12:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm
>> 13:00)
>> Regrets:
>> Chair: Joakim
>> Scribe: TBA
>> 
>> Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html
>> Propose to accept F2F minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/16-mediaann-
>> minutes.html
>> 
>> 2. Next meeting
>> Tuesday 2010-12-07
>> 
>> 3. Items
>> [A] Action items:
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
>> 
>> [B] If we have a quorum, discuss the set of changes to the (abstract)
>> Ontology, summarized here by Jean-Pierre:
>> 
>> - It is proposed to add track as a sub-class of fragment to help
>> aligning with MFWG
>> - It is proposed to add videoTrack and audioTrack to which currently
>> existing specialised properties like frameRate or sampleRate will be
>> more specifically linked as well as a better use of the compression
>> property
>> - It is proposed to add captioningTrack to better align with MFWG and
>> also to address subtitling more properly
>> 
>> - It is proposed to change createDate (or creationDate) as "date" and
>> list createDate (or creationDate) at the same level as releaseDate,
>> etc.  This allows better hierarchical representation of dates in the
>> RDF ontology as, for example, releaseDate cannot be considered as a
>> subclass of createDate?
>> 
>> - RatingValue should be float but it should now have been corrected in
>> the API following today review of actions.
>> 
>> - language and compression should allow string but also anyURI values,
>> which would allow using SKOS concepts from classification schemes
>> 
>> [C] Follow up on Implementation of LC comments
>> 
>> 1- Media Ontology spec
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2393 : NOT reviewed
>> -- LC Comment -2405:  JP Evain:
>> Introduction
>> -          Note to implementers, content authors - not really explicit,
>> maybe these roles should be mentioned saying things like "it is
>> expected that implementers will do."  ". to the benefit of content
>> providers", etc.
>> 
>> -          There is no section 1.1 on the purpose of the specification
>> (yet)
>> 
>> Section 4.1 core property definitions -> now section 5.1
>> -          The ma: prefix still appears in the table but since the
>> comment was made Pierre Antoine, while working on the mapping table
>> suggested that the prefix should only be used with the ma-ont namespace
>> in the RDF -> reconsider position?
>> 
>> Section 4.2.2 - no change as explained in previous response - tables in
>> line -> now 5.2.2
>> 
>> Joakim: "our specification" is replaced by "this specification" (OK),
>> But "our Ontology" (two occurrences in section 1)
>> 
>> Other comments from JP review
>> 
>> The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the RDF
>> ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.
>> 
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2389 : NO - partially implemented
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0086.html
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2404 : NO - partially implemented
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0093.html
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0085.html
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0094.html
>> 
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing)
>> see edits at
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0073.html
>> 
>> ____________
>> 
>> 2- Media API spec
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2395 : NOT reviewed
>> -- LC Comment -2406 : NOT reviewed
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2419 : NO partially implemented
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0090.html
>> 
>> -- LC Comment -2410 : OK But Chris must add Véronique's edits see edits
>> at:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0107.html
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0106.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [D] reminder : Metadata examples needed!
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-
>> annotation/2010Nov/0081.html
>> 
>> During the F2F in Lyon, we decided to verify our mapping ontology by
>> having metadata in each format
>> AOB
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> /Joakim
>> 
>> 

_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
http://twitter.com/fstegmai
_____________________________

Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 08:10:26 UTC