ACTION-340: LC comment 2417

Hi all!

Regarding to my action points, i have checked the comment was reflected in the document. The definitions of copyright and policy look fine, but the type definition is a little bit weird to me.

{ (((statement:String), (identifier:URI)) | ((statement:String), (identifier:URI)?) | ((statement:String)?, (identifier:URI))), (type:URI)? }

Maybe i missed something, but i donīt understand the "?" should it mean optional? Anyway, the PLING group proposed to use three properties - maybe i missed also the discussion about it ;)

The rest of the comments are reflected.

Cheers,
Florian
_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
http://twitter.com/fstegmai
_____________________________

Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 13:08:12 UTC