- From: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:42:09 +0100
- To: Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
- Cc: tmichel@w3.org, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5E78E4F0-232B-40D5-8407-4052F0235F8E@few.vu.nl>
On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Daniel Park wrote: > Veronique, please use this version below for your editing and > uploading to the cvs. Yes. My question was to know when you will be done going through the LC comments to check out that they have all been taken into account. I will be working on your stabilised version of teh document. Of the document below, yes. Véronique > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Veronique Malaise > <vmalaise@few.vu.nl> wrote: > Yes, the result looks good indeed! I spotted at least one REF that > has to be filled and the property table has still to be changed > according to the style of the 1st line. I can update it with > concrete examples, that was part of my action items. Let me know > when there is a new stable version of the document, for me to > fulfill my pending actions :) > > Véronique > > > > > On Nov 4, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: > > Véronique, > > The XML file is now uploaded, > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.xml > > and the merged HTML Ontology is available at > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html > > Result looks good. > > Thierry > > > Le 04/11/2010 12:16, Veronique Malaise a écrit : > Hi, > > Here is the XML file. So the idea is that you go through the merged > document and the LC comments, and select which part of the conflicting > version should be kept? It's handier to do this collaboratively on > your > side, I can comment on IRC and answer questions if you need. > > Best, > Véronique= > > > > > > > -- > Soohong Daniel Park > Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D > http://www.soohongp.com, twitter:@natpt >
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 13:43:40 UTC