Re: RDFisation of the MAWG ontology

Hi Jean-Pierre,

I did not want to imply that you are not busy, and I am very sorry if it
sounded like that. I am not sure if I can make the call tomorrow, but if
that is OK with you, Tobias, please add my to the participants list in
Skype.

Felix

2010/3/30 Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>

>  Hi Felix,
>
>
>
> We are all living the same fate. Saying I have nothing to do would be an
> euphemism.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>
>
> *From:* felix.sasaki@googlemail.com [mailto:felix.sasaki@googlemail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Felix Sasaki
> *Sent:* mardi, 30. mars 2010 15:03
> *To:* Evain, Jean-Pierre
> *Cc:* ???; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: RDFisation of the MAWG ontology
>
>
>
> Hello Jean-Pierre,
>
> I am busy with other things, so I can't take the time to organize the
> taskforce - so if you or somebody else wants to take over ...
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> 2010/3/30 Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
>
> Hello there,
>
>
>
> Who can tell me / confirm if there is a call of the RDF TF sometimes soon
> (tomorrow?)
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Jean-pierre
>
>
>
> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:
> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *???
> *Sent:* mardi, 30. mars 2010 14:18
> *To:* public-media-annotation@w3.org
> *Subject:* ReSpec.js ? W3C Specification Writing Tool
>
>
>
> Hi. All,
>
> When I made the initial draft of Gallery API in DAP WG, I had experience of
> ReSpec.js. It’s really cool to editors and even readers.
>
> So in today’s call, I proposed to change the XML based source
> file(XMLSpec.dtd based)of our API doc to ReSpec.js based source.
>
> If you want to understand more for this, just refer below doc ;)
>
>
>
> ReSpec.js — W3C Specification Writing Tool
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html
>
>
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
> Wonsuk.
>
>
>