Re: RDFisation of the MAWG ontology

Hi Thierry

thanks for the offer - we will tell you a week ahead of the next telecon
to setup the bridge.

Thanks!

Best,

Tobias


> I you want to have a zakim bridge I can set one up, for future telecons.
>
> Tobias Bürger wrote:
>> Hi Jean-Pierre,
>>
>> I can very much agree to your comment.
>>
>> I would suggest that we have the short Skype telecon tomorrow a 16 CEST
>> and at least briefly discuss the status, direction, and how we can bring
>> this taskforce forward.
>>
>> I know that Werner B., pa, and Jean-Pierre will join tomorrow. If others
>> would like to join, then please send me your Skype-Ids and I will setup
>> the call.
>>
>> Talk to you tomorrow!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Tobias
>>> Hi Felix,
>>>
>>> We are all living the same fate. Saying I have nothing to do would be
>>> an
>>> euphemism.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jean-Pierre
>>>
>>> From: felix.sasaki@googlemail.com [mailto:felix.sasaki@googlemail.com]
>>> On
>>> Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
>>> Sent: mardi, 30. mars 2010 15:03
>>> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
>>> Cc: ???; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: RDFisation of the MAWG ontology
>>>
>>> Hello Jean-Pierre,
>>>
>>> I am busy with other things, so I can't take the time to organize the
>>> taskforce - so if you or somebody else wants to take over ...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Felix
>>> 2010/3/30 Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch<mailto:evain@ebu.ch>>
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> Who can tell me / confirm if there is a call of the RDF TF sometimes
>>> soon
>>> (tomorrow?)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jean-pierre
>>>
>>> From:
>>> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org<mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org<mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>]
>>> On Behalf Of ???
>>> Sent: mardi, 30. mars 2010 14:18
>>> To:
>>> public-media-annotation@w3.org<mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>> Subject: ReSpec.js ? W3C Specification Writing Tool
>>>
>>> Hi. All,
>>> When I made the initial draft of Gallery API in DAP WG, I had
>>> experience
>>> of ReSpec.js. It's really cool to editors and even readers.
>>> So in today's call, I proposed to change the XML based source
>>> file(XMLSpec.dtd based)of our API doc to ReSpec.js based source.
>>> If you want to understand more for this, just refer below doc ;)
>>>
>>> ReSpec.js - W3C Specification Writing Tool
>>> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html
>>>
>>>
>>> best regards,
>>> Wonsuk.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
_________________________________________________
Dr. Tobias Bürger

tobias.buerger@sti2.at
__________________________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 14:19:46 UTC