- From: Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:58:52 +0200
- To: "Tobias Bürger" <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
- Cc: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, "'???'" <wslee@etri.re.kr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi! Sorry for the late reply, I cannot make it tomorrow at 16h. I would be available tomorrow between 12 and 16h. Best, Véronique On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Tobias Bürger wrote: > Hi Jean-pierre, > > according to our Doodle tomorrow 16:00 would be fine for the people > who > filled out the poll. Unfortunately the core people did not indicate > their > availability. > > What about Felix, Veronique, Raphael who participated in the initial > discussion? > > Would you want to join and could you join at 16:00 CEST tomorrow? > > > Best regards, > > Tobias > >> Hello there, >> >> Who can tell me / confirm if there is a call of the RDF TF >> sometimes soon >> (tomorrow?) >> >> Regards, >> >> Jean-pierre >> >> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ??? >> Sent: mardi, 30. mars 2010 14:18 >> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org >> Subject: ReSpec.js ? W3C Specification Writing Tool >> >> Hi. All, >> When I made the initial draft of Gallery API in DAP WG, I had >> experience >> of ReSpec.js. It’s really cool to editors and even readers. >> So in today’s call, I proposed to change the XML based source >> file(XMLSpec.dtd based)of our API doc to ReSpec.js based source. >> If you want to understand more for this, just refer below doc ;) >> >> ReSpec.js — W3C Specification Writing Tool >> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html >> >> >> best regards, >> Wonsuk. >> > > > -- > _________________________________________________ > Dr. Tobias Bürger > > STI Innsbruck > University of Innsbruck, Austria > http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ > > tobias.buerger@sti2.at > __________________________________________________ > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 13:00:28 UTC