Re: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?

Hi all,

it seems that a large part of the working group is participating, which is
great. I agree with Veronique, a a skype meeting is good. I will be on
travel starting this evening until Tuesday, but Tuesday before or after the
regular call would work for me. Maybe we can have even one intensive meeting
for 2 hours to get the general architecture done quickly. So how about
Tuesday, 16th March, 13-15 UTC?

Felix

2010/3/11 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>

> Hi. All.
>
> I would like to join the Task Force as well ;)
>
> Best regards,
> Wonsuk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> > annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre
> > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 6:45 PM
> > To: 'vmalaise'; Bailer, Werner
> > Cc: Tobias Bürger; raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr; Soohong Daniel Park; Felix
> > Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Count me in.
> >
> > Jean-Pierre
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> > annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of vmalaise
> > Sent: jeudi, 11. mars 2010 10:29
> > To: Bailer, Werner
> > Cc: Tobias Bürger; raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr; Soohong Daniel Park; Felix
> > Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > I would also be interested in participating. Should we have a skype
> > meeting soon to decide on the architecture? I guess the best would be to
> > extend the part that already exist from Werner or Chris, but we should
> > decide for one only for time reasons, right?
> >
> > Best,
> > Véronique
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:30:12 +0100, "Bailer, Werner"
> > <werner.bailer@joanneum.at> wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I also got the question before, and it is in line with what we need in
> > our
> > > implementation, so I would support such a task force.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Werner
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> > >> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of "Tobias Bürger"
> > >> Sent: Donnerstag, 11. März 2010 09:23
> > >> To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
> > >> Cc: Soohong Daniel Park; 'Felix Sasaki';
> public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > >> Subject: Re: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I also got this request from a couple of people before...
> > >>
> > >> I would join a task force to realize this in the course of the MAWG;
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >> Tobias
> > >>
> > >> >> It's good news to the group. What's due in his schedule ? and only
> > >> RDF
> > >> >> not API ?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> And, what folks thank about this TF for RDF representation of our
> > >> >> ontology 1.0 ?
> > >> >
> > >> > I would be very very pleased to see this ontology represented in
> > >> > RDFS/OWL/SKOS/RIF also as soon as possible. I got similar questions
> > >> > (almost daily) with people working in multimedia related web
> > >> companies.
> > >> >
> > >> >    Raphaël
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Raphaël Troncy
> > >> > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> > >> > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
> > >> > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> > >> > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> > >> > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> > >> > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/<http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Etroncy/>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> _________________________________________________
> > >> Dr. Tobias Bürger
> > >>
> > >> STI Innsbruck
> > >> University of Innsbruck, Austria
> > >> http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/
> > >>
> > >> tobias.buerger@sti2.at
> > >> __________________________________________________
> > >>
>
>