Re: Update API document

Wonsuk,

Thanks for your update. The API document is now ready for publication on
TR space (it will now occur next tuesday).
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/WD_V2/Overview.html

just a small remark for
2.3.6.2 TargetAudience

in the example
should
[http://www.fosi.org/icra,"no nudity", "Age Group"]

not be
["http://www.fosi.org/icra","no nudity", "Age Group"]

Thierry.


이원석 wrote:
> Hi. Thierry.
> I also updated the API doc(http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/WD_V2/Overview.html) directly with my new jigedit password.
> 
> Best regards,
> Wonsuk.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 이원석
>> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:13 AM
>> To: tmichel@w3.org
>> Cc: Chris.Poppe@UGent.be; Felix Sasaki; Bailer, Werner; public-media-
>> annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: Update API document
>>
>> Hi. Thierry.
>> I fixed bugs. Please find the enclosed file.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Wonsuk.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 12:40 AM
>>> To: Chris.Poppe@UGent.be
>>> Cc: 'Felix Sasaki'; 'Bailer, Werner'; 이원석; public-media-
>>> annotation@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Update API document
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> I have copied the API document to
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/WD_V2/Overvie
>>> w.ht
>>> ml
>>>
>>> The document does not validate HTML.
>>> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Anno
>>> tati
>>> ons/drafts/API10/WD_V2/Overview.html
>>>
>>> Also there is a broken link
>>>
>>> Line: 648 ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> Please fix these two issues ASAP as I can not publish the document as is.
>>>
>>>
>>> On my side I have updated the Status of this document section and
>>> header section to conform to the publication rules.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Thierry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Poppe wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have updated the API document according to the remarks of Werner
>>>> (except for the list of possible values remark).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Felix,
>>>>
>>>> I guess the request could look something like this (I have no idea
>>>> about the proper syntax so it’s just to give you an idea):
>>>>
>>>> Request:
>>>> http://example.com/my-media-resource/getProperty?ma-name=x&?ma-
>>> source=y&?ma-subtype=z&?ma-language=s&?ma-fragment=t
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not sure how to denote that these are optional parameters, or what
>>>> the JSON format is to return the list of MAObjects that correspond
>>>> to the request. I am sure you can come up with a good solution.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regard,
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Felix
>>> Sasaki
>>>> *Sent:* maandag 1 maart 2010 20:35
>>>> *To:* Bailer, Werner
>>>> *Cc:* ???; Chris.Poppe@ugent.be; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Update API document
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Werner, Chris, all,
>>>>
>>>> I agree with your comments, esp. the non-alignment between the Web
>>>> Service Usage and the API. I am happy to change the Web Service
>>>> usage and implement other comments in this thread, but it would be
>>>> great to have an example for one property how the web service
>>>> request should look like.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks in advance & best,
>>>>
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>> 2010/3/1 Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at
>>>> <mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think the API document has progressed a lot. I have the following
>>>> remarks (in addition to Chris’):
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - the first editorial note in section 2 can be removed, this is IMO
>>>> now
>>> done
>>>> - the second editorial note (SET functionality) could be turned into
>>>> text explaining the reasons for not including set functionality now.
>>>> Even if we decide to add it, it is unlikely to be mandatory for an
>>>> implementation.
>>>>
>>>> - the editorial note in the first sentence of “Web service” in 2.1
>>>> can be removed, this is done with the Felix definitions
>>>>
>>>> - the image file for the figure in section 2.1 seems not to be at
>>>> the right place, also I suggest to use a PNG instead of a JPEG for a
>>>> figure like this
>>>>
>>>> - section 2.1 as the text references “scenario x” it might be useful
>>>> to add “scenario x: …” to the headings user agent and web service
>>>>
>>>> - if I saw that correctly, all return types inherit (at least) from
>>>> MAObject - should get Property return MAObject[] instead of object[] ?
>>>>
>>>> - 2.3.1.1 what is EASN? Was this meant to say ISAN?
>>>>
>>>> - 2.3.1.1 wrong indentation of the attribute of the Identifier
>>>> interface
>>>>
>>>> - 2.3.1.3 the example for language should not say N/A
>>>>
>>>> - 2.3.2.4 <http://2.3.2.4>: typos: “altitudee” and “altitiude”
>>>> (seems someone doesn’t like this word ;-)
>>>>
>>>> - lists of possible value: this is quite inconsistent now, e.g. a
>>>> list of values for ma:contributor, but not for ma:creator; for some
>>>> it seems to make sense to put them directly into the document (e.g.
>>>> types of policy, and possibly relation), but for those where there
>>>> can be many values (genre, creator, contributor) we should reference
>>>> a vocabulary we consider best practice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Werner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *???
>>>> *Sent:* Samstag, 27. Februar 2010 16:03
>>>> *To:* Felix Sasaki; Chris.Poppe@ugent.be
>>>> <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Cc:* public-media-annotation@w3.org <mailto:public-media-
>>> annotation@w3.org>
>>>> *Subject:* RE: Update API document
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi. Felix, Chris and all.
>>>>
>>>> Most of all, thanks for Felix and Chris’s revision.
>>>>
>>>> I updated the API doc with Felix’s file. In addition I commit two
>>>> files(XML and HTML) from Felix to the CVS repository. Because I
>>>> guess Thierry is on the trip at this moment ;)
>>>>
>>>> So you can take a look at the last version of API doc via below link.
>>>>
>>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-
>>> 1.0.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Wonsuk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of
>>>> *Felix
>>> Sasaki
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2010 9:20 PM
>>>> *To:* Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
>>>> *Cc:* public-media-annotation@w3.org <mailto:public-media-
>>> annotation@w3.org>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Update API document
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Chris, all,
>>>>
>>>> 2010/2/25 Chris Poppe <chris.poppe@ugent.be
>>> <mailto:chris.poppe@ugent.be>>
>>>> Now I really changed the subject of the mail so that people are not
>>>> confused.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Chris
>>>> --
>>>> Ghent University - Multimedia Lab
>>>> Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41
>>>> B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
>>>>
>>>> tel: +32 9 264 89 17
>>>> fax: +32 9 264 35 94
>>>> e-mail: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
>>>> From: "Chris Poppe" <chris.poppe@ugent.be
>>>> <mailto:chris.poppe@ugent.be>>
>>>> To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>"
>>>> <public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org>>
>>>> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:25:40 +0100
>>>> Subject: RE: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> please find attached an updated version of the API document (both
>>>> xml file and html file) (I am having troubles to upload this).
>>>>
>>>> Felix, after you add your updates could you please upload this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I made the updates, but unfortunately I am also currently not able
>>>> to commit to CVS. Thierry, could you do that? See
>>>>
>>>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/ma-api-doc-20100226.zip
>>>> <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/ma-api-doc-20100226.zip>
>>>>
>>>> The ZIP-File contains an HTML-version of the draft, the XML-source,
>>>> and a diff between Chris' version and mine, to show you my edits. If
>>>> there are further comments today, I can make another editing round
>> tonight.
>>>> Btw., I changed some of the non-webservice examples, since the
>>>> output seemed inconsistent, e.g. the writing conventions for
>>>> DOMString result types are not always the same. Also a question:
>>>> should we have one convention for properties names with multiple
>>>> words, e.g. "named fragments"? I would propose to use small caps and a
>> hyphen always, e.g.
>>>> "named-fragments". What do people think?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Current changes:
>>>>     added subtypes/roles
>>>>     added information on the use of the API (two use case scenarios)
>>>>     created new interface to hold language attribute.
>>>>     created new interface to hold uri, sourceformat, fragmentidentifier
>>>>     and mappingtype
>>>>     Updated the document with information on how to use the subtypes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Kind regards,
>>>>     Chris
>>>>
>>>>     --
>>>>     Ghent University - Multimedia Lab
>>>>     Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41
>>>>     B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
>>>>
>>>>     tel: +32 9 264 89 17
>>>>     fax: +32 9 264 35 94
>>>>     e-mail: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be <mailto:Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
>>>>
>>>>     URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 07:18:01 UTC