Re: The second revision of ontology doc after the Seoul F2F meeting

Hi Wonsuk,


2010/3/1 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>

>  Hi. Felix.
>
> Thanks for your comment.
>
>
>
> *From:* felix.sasaki@googlemail.com [mailto:felix.sasaki@googlemail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Felix Sasaki
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:46 PM
> *To:* 이원석
> *Cc:* public-media-annotation@w3.org
> *Subject:* Re: The second revision of ontology doc after the Seoul F2F
> meeting
>
>
>
> Hello Wonsuk,
>
> great work! One minor comments below. IMO you don't need to integrate that
> before publication (which is not a last call draft anyway).
> à Sure. but I would like to get the feedbacks after publishing more mature
> draft even it’s not a last call ;)
>
>
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#property-value-types-definitions
> I think we should check whether the XML Schema data types match the return
> types we use for the API. There might be subtle or larger differences, e.g.
> with dateTime. I am happy to take that action item, if people agree that it
> is useful.
> à I am absolutely agreed.   Do you think we need to remove current texts
> for the publication ?
>

No, I don't think so. We will not publish a "last call" draft, so such a
change is OK after publication. I would only propose to add a note like
this, to warn readers, between "3 Property value type definitions" and "3.1
URI":

"Currently the data types are defined in terms of XML Schema, part 2. The
Working Group intends to check and potentially modify these definitions, to
ensure compatibility with the return types defined in the API for Media
Resources 1.0"

What do you think?

Best,

Felix


> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wonsuk
>
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
>  2010/2/26 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I updated ontology doc according to the comments from Werner and Veronique
> as below.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
>
>
>
> Please review of this document.
>
> If you have any comment, please let me know. It’s really more than welcome
> J
>
> If there isn’t any comments for this version, This version will be
> published next week.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wonsuk.
>
>
>