- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:39:28 +0200
- To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hi, Regarding the LC comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0076.html It could be a good idea to indicate that the mappings we are covering in our Ontology document are only informative. Also the suggestion to create one Recommendation with the Ontology (the normative stuff) and one W3C Note with the mappings identified is something to be discussed. This meets the other LC comment raising a formal objection. about speex and VP8 not included in the Ontology http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/2393?cid=2393 We will see if we have other people complaining about omitted formats. We should ask these people to provide mapping tables. Thierry.
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 18:39:38 UTC