- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:33:13 +0200
- To: "raphael.troncy" <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: Media Annotation <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTilRyYIXfZvrWoA071pG3U4MQzlXlhBISmuvQxf6@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Raphael Am 7. Juni 2010 14:12:41 UTC+2 schrieb Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl >: > Dear all, > > I have been able to locate the Media Ontology drafts at: > - http://www.salzburgresearch.at/~tbuerger/ma-ont.rdfs<http://www.salzburgresearch.at/%7Etbuerger/ma-ont.rdfs>(original RDFS version) > - http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/W3C_MAWG/ma-ont-rev.rdfs.xml(revised RDFS version) > - http://www.salzburgresearch.at/~tbuerger/ma-ont.owl<http://www.salzburgresearch.at/%7Etbuerger/ma-ont.owl>(original OWL version). > Why not checking in these files in a single obvious location that is the > Media Annotations WG web space, e.g. in > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/ontology/ ? > > I wanted to do that myself, but I just realize how messy was this CVS web > directory, with many duplicate folders. Who is doing some cleanup and > administration here ? > > Further, the namespace of the Media Ontology seems to be: > http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont#. Is this the final namespace? I observe it is > inconsistent with the usual non-written W3C policy There is a policy for W3C namespaces, see http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri. It includes also the "non dated" option. > where namespaces tend to include dates (see e.g. OWL, RDF, RDFS, SKOS, > etc.). It is also largely inconsistent with community practice from the Web > of Data community. I wonder how much the choice of the namespace has been > discussed? > > I would like to point out the importance of this issue. Remember the SKOS > history, that has debated for many weeks the change of its namespace but > couldn't since too many applications relying on the old one would have been > broken! I'm already using the ma-ont namespace in my application, so take a > decision sooner than later! > I think both options - dated or not - are fine and in accordance with the W3C namespace policy mentioned above. I don't have a preference for one of them - stability of the choice is most important. Best, Felix > Thanks. > > Raphaël > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ <http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Etroncy/> > > >
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 13:32:16 UTC