Re: [mawg] action-249: rdfs taskforce update

Hi Veronique,

Am 01.06.2010 12:02, schrieb Veronique Malaise:
> Hi Tobias, all,
>
> I had two questions about this version:
> 1/ how do you envisage to express the value of the rating if the 
> rating property is an object property, pointing to a skos Concept?
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="rating">
>      <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept"/>
>      <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#MediaResource"/>
>    </owl:ObjectProperty>
So we envisaged to express avalable rating values as SKOS: Concept(s).
This is a rather simple approach; I agree. We could think of including a 
more complex rating scheme as well (e.g. something similar to the PICS 
rating scheme or the review vocabulary)
>
> 2/ how do you envisage to represent the position as lat/long/alt if 
> this is the only value that you have for the location? This could work 
> with a GeoRSS concept, for example, but maybe you decided on the 
> implementation of one of the possible options only? Just wondering :)
We envisaged the encoding of positions via a Location concept which we 
introduced (see hasLocation(Location)). The Location concept is however 
not yet specified. We didn't get too far with discussion of the shape of 
the concepts we introduced (also Person, etc. is rather underspecified 
currently).

Best,

Tobias
>
> Véronique
>    
>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Tobias Bürger wrote:
>
>> Hi Jean-Pierre, Pierre-Antoine,
>>
>> thanks for your feedback
>>
>> Am 31.05.2010 17:19, schrieb Evain, Jean-Pierre:
>>> Actually Publisher and Creator are subclasses of contributors but 
>>> certainly not of Actor. Actor is also a subclass of Contributor.
>>>
>> I agree on this - I updated the ontology accordingly.
>>> I mean IsA vs. a XML like name of an element like 'Title' vs 'hasTitle'
>>>
>> yes, we surely have to find an agreement on that, i.e. how we would 
>> like to name the properties / classes. At the moment I use hasXYZ for 
>> properties that I newly introduced (i.e. hasTrack, hasPublisher). But 
>> I would be strongly in favor to consistent naming in one or the other 
>> way.
>>>
>>>> The other issue, going one step further is about e.g. title or
>>>> description types.  My proposal for this is as follows: e.g. title
>>>> types like 'main' should be sub-properties of the title property. In
>>>> practice, migrating to RDF would require taking all controlled terms
>>>> from the predefined list of types and change them into subproperties.
>>>> If you update the list, then you create a new sub-property ->  this is
>>>> taking benefit of the scalability of the RDF model.
>>>>
>>> I agree with that.
>>>
>> I agree with that as well.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Tobias
>>>   pa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jean-pierre
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From:
>>>> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org 
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org>
>>>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tobias
>>>> Bürger Sent: lundi, 31. mai 2010 11:01 To:
>>>> public-media-annotation@w3.org 
>>>> <mailto:public-media-annotation@w3.org> Subject: [mawg] action-249: 
>>>> rdfs
>>>> taskforce update
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> with respect to my action-249: I hacked the first version of our
>>>> ma-ont proposal. You can find a visualization of it at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Ontology_Implementation
>>>>
>>>>  I will add a documentation and the sources to the mawg wiki latest
>>>> tomorrow on the same page.
>>>>
>>>> Any feedback and contributions more than welcome!
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> **************************************************
>>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>>> are addressed.
>>> If you have received this email in error,
>>> please notify the system manager.
>>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>>> **************************************************
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> ================================================================
>> Dr. Tobias Bürger         Knowledge and Media Technologies Group
>> Salzburg Research                           FON +43.662.2288-415
>> Forschungsgesellschaft                      FAX +43.662.2288-222
>> Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/III tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at 
>> <mailto:tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>
>> A-5020 Salzburg | AUSTRIA http://www.salzburgresearch.at
>>
>>
>

-- 
================================================================
Dr. Tobias Bürger         Knowledge and Media Technologies Group
Salzburg Research                           FON +43.662.2288-415
Forschungsgesellschaft                      FAX +43.662.2288-222
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/III   tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at
A-5020 Salzburg | AUSTRIA         http://www.salzburgresearch.at